While I agree with every word you just presented here. This is not applicable to Trump as it is not the lack of prohibition providing support, rather its the existence of provision does under congressional law. I don't like the man and didn't vote for him, but he's not in the wrong on this one.
If you are interested, you are welcome to read the 50 legal points I've documented in the article below that provides indefensible evidence as written in law of the indictment having no legal merit. Mostly, there is one count that has merit.